Original result
The two real-surgery groups never reported less pain or better movement than the fake-surgery group at any point over two years. The results were published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2002, and doctors began to question how well this operation works for osteoarthritis.
What we know today
Later trials comparing surgery with sham surgery gave similar results. In 2017, an international expert panel writing in The BMJ made a strong recommendation against this kind of arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee disease. The study has a limitation too: almost all the patients were men from a single veterans’ hospital.
The surprising part
One year later, the group with the lowest pain score was the fake-surgery group. The difference was not significant, but the knees where nothing was done did not fall behind.
This page is for information only and is not medical advice. Talk to a doctor about decisions on your own health.
Sources
- Moseley, J. B., O’Malley, K., Petersen, N. J., et al. (2002). A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. New England Journal of Medicine, 347(2), 81–88. doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa013259
- {"Siemieniuk, R. A. C., Harris, I. A., Agoritsas, T., et al. (2017). Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee arthritis and meniscal tears"=>"a clinical practice guideline. BMJ, 357, j1982."} doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j1982